AI Tutor.
Shows the working. Never turns it in.
The AI Tutor maps the assignment, opens the source material when it's available, and starts with a diagnostic question before it teaches anything. From there it coaches with Socratic hints, never hands over finished answers, and checks understanding with a transfer question before it lets you move on. It teaches; it never does the work or submits it for you.
Diagnose first, hint don't hand over, verify with a fresh transfer question before moving on.
Reads the prompt and any attached source material so it's coaching you on the actual task, not a guess at it.
Opens with a question about where you're stuck so the walkthrough targets the gap, not the whole topic.
A ladder of nudges points at the next step. If you keep getting stuck, the hints get more specific, but Aluma never types the finished answer into your worksheet.
An explanation isn't proof. Before you move on, Aluma checks with a fresh problem that tests the same idea.
The write / submit capability isn't in the product. Aluma helps you understand and draft; you turn it in.
Paste it, snap a photo, or open it from School Sync. Aluma reads the prompt and any linked source.
One short question up front to find the actual gap.
You do the steps. Aluma nudges when you're stuck, and shows the working when you ask for the reasoning.
A fresh problem covering the same concept. Miss it and Aluma loops back; nail it and it's marked as understood in your Learning Ledger.
No. The tutor is built to teach the step, not skip it. You can ask for a worked example on a different problem, but it won't hand over the answer to your assigned one.
No. Aluma doesn't have a submit capability, by design. It teaches and drafts; you turn it in.
Used as a tutor, no. It's the same conversation you'd have with a human tutor who refuses to do your homework.